A Poem by Kodo Sawaki
Doing zazen calmly in the dojo,
Putting aside all negative thoughts,
Obtaining nothing but a mind without desire,
-This joy is beyond paradise.
The world runs after fame, honor,
Beautiful clothes and comfort.
But these pleasures are not true peace.
You run and stay unsatisfied until death!
Wear the kesa and black robe and practice zazen.
Concentrate with a single mind, whether still or in motion.
See with your own eyes deep inner wisdom.
Observe and know intimately the true aspect of all action and all existence.
Be able to observe balance.
Understand and know with a mind that is perfectly still.
If you are like this,
Your spiritual dimension,
The highest in this world,
Will be beyond compare.
12 Comments:
Whenever we use our senses, we find the physical
self. But when we act, we experience oneness between self and circumstances. And in this
oneness, we experience neither constructed self (permanent self) nor physical self (no
permanent self) as separate. But to deny the existence of a real self at this very moment is
a misunderstanding of what the Buddha taught. Master Kodo Sawaki said: “Grasp the self,
the ultimate in ourselves, the true ego - whatever you call it. It is absolutely necessary to
seize it, for as it is, it is the nature of Buddha.” - Michael Eido Luetchford
I read something once by Kodo Sawaki about the kesa, how it represents the entire world and when you wear it, you are wrapping yourself in the universe. Kodo wrote some very poetic stuff that has stopped me in my tracks.
I'll see if I can find it later, as I am interested in knowing if it is as powerful for others here...
I hope that this poem is better in Japanese, cos it sucks balls in English.
Hey, how many Japanese Zen Masters from Sawaki's time have written poems about the rape of Nanking? Just curious.
Seriously, why not just put up poetry by Osama Bin Laden? They seem to have a roughly equal moral/religious outlook.
I feel that poetry like this idealizes meditation and creates a fetish of enlightenment and attaining special states of mind.
g
Oh, Dan, I'm sorry, the poem is brilliant and Sawaki was not a bigot, warmonger, and killer. Don't bother adressing what I said, just circle the wagons.
da - When war is seen as just, it is especially hard to resist. All spiritual traditions go through periods of light and dark. Yours is going through one at this very moment. Buddhist masters are subject to karma like everyone else. Understand, there is no such thing as a perfect master.
I'm guessing you just like to show off your satori, but that just shows you are still lacking it. You refer to yourself as a white dude in your "about me" blurb. That shows me you are still hung up in dualistic racial thinking. Thinking that is probably very similar to what Sawaki indulged in for a time. What does your being "white" have to do with anything? I think you have your own issues.
Before your criticize Kudo Sawaki, of whom you know next to nothing, you should take a hard look at yourself. That is the beginning of real satori.
aaron - that is one way of looking at it. there are others.
Da: "Seriously, why not just put up poetry by Osama Bin Laden? They seem to have a roughly equal moral/religious outlook."
Da, the objective of the post is to consider the teaching, not celebrate the man.
The style of your writing makes me guess that you are interested in logic and debate. If so, you may already know that your comment is a textbook example of the Ad Hominem fallacy. I just mention this as a point of interest, because it seems almost intentional.
"When war is seen as just, it is especially hard to resist. All spiritual traditions go through periods of light and dark. Yours is going through one at this very moment."
Which is why I don't quote the worst people involved with it admiringly. Go to my page and you will find nothing in praise of "Mullah" Umar or the mufto of Jerusalem who collaborated with the nazis. However, nobody counterposes Islam to religion and claims that Muslims are beyond all that. Buddhists do it with Buddhism all the time, and in point of fact Brad does it pretty shamelessly.
"Understand, there is no such thing as a perfect master."
Can you really see no difference between mere imperfection and what this dude was guilty of?
"I'm guessing you just like to show off your satori, but that just shows you are still lacking it"
I don't believe in Satori. Project your own thoughts on someone else.
"You refer to yourself as a white dude in your "about me" blurb. That shows me you are still hung up in dualistic racial thinking. Thinking that is probably very similar to what Sawaki indulged in for a time. What does your being "white" have to do with anything"
Yeah, my off the cuff remark about my maggot colored skin is the same as mass murder. You guys just never give up, do you?
"Before your criticize Kudo Sawaki, of whom you know next to nothing, you should take a hard look at yourself. That is the beginning of real satori."
This grows repetitious.
I.NEVER.HAVE.MURDERED.ANYONE.OR.ENCOURAGED.MURDER. Yeah, I'm not perfect, feet of clay and all that, shocking I know; but there are degrees. Put down the Kool Aid and stop reflexively defending a nazi for a moment.
"Da, the objective of the post is to consider the teaching, not celebrate the man.
The style of your writing makes me guess that you are interested in logic and debate. If so, you may already know that your comment is a textbook example of the Ad Hominem fallacy. I just mention this as a point of interest, because it seems almost intentional. "
I object to the idea that you can seperate the teacher from the man. Your Guru Brad said much teh same thing, but apparently it only applies to drunken Tibetans like Trungpa, not your own beloved Japanese War Criminals.
These guys were on the same side as, and had similar ideology to, the Nazis. Write it off all you want, it's still true.
"think anatman has already addressed what you said. it doesn't really have anything to do with my or your personal estimation of kodo sawaki. it's more about the content of the poem which is why i think gniz's comment is a fair enough point."
All else aside, I still think the poem sucks regardless of Sawaki's character. In English, of course. Maybe it's a masterpiece in Japanese?
I agree with Issa's (saws) quote. But here's the thing;
Kodo Sawaki is guilty of horrible atrocities. Me occasionally being a dick is not the same, no matter how you cut it. Do you defend everyone thsi way? I doubt it. I think it's just reflexive and dishonest defense of your own lineages. It's shameful and only a couple steps above Holocaust Denial.
I do not defend Kodo Sawaki, Brad Warner, the Bible, the Koran, or Buddhist scripture. However, I have found all of these to be sources of wisdom, as well as sources of information with which I disagree.
Personally, I do not know enough about Kodo Sawaki to have an opinion on how he lived. My only exposure to his teaching has been in fragments. And I have found wisdom in those fragments.
The Bible and the Koran both include chapters that prescribe actions which we now consider atrocities. Does this mean we should entirely dismiss these books as sources of wisdom?
da, You assume way too much. Not everyone that writes to this blog is Buddhist. You might be trying to bait the Buddhists here but you do not even know who you are writing to. I don’t have any emotional investment in Gudo Sawaki or the so-called prophet Muhammed, but I can smell a hypocrite. I could say it is shameful for you to follow the religion of a mass murderer.. but I won't mock you.
"Personally, I do not know enough about Kodo Sawaki to have an opinion on how he lived."
Why would you debate me about him then?
"The Bible and the Koran both include chapters that prescribe actions which we now consider atrocities. Does this mean we should entirely dismiss these books as sources of wisdom?"
Have you ever actually studied the Qu'ran, or are you just repeating something you heard somewhere?
Incidentally, I'm not dismissing Buddhism, Buddha, whatever, nor trying to make this about Buddhism vs. Islam. I'm not the one who brought Islam into the conversation. I'm talking about a very specific group of individuals in the past century and people who mindlessly follow them while proclaiming the superiority of Soto Zen (which has all the markings of religion, but is not one, cos religion sucks and umm, Zen is better and about reality).
"da, You assume way too much."
I assume nothing that is not self-evident after talking to these people.
"Not everyone that writes to this blog is Buddhist."
Obviously. Your point?
"You might be trying to bait the Buddhists"
No, I'm not. As I just pointed out, I haven't attacked Buddhism per se once, just specific Buddhists over specific actions. Nice strawman you're building though!
"I don’t have any emotional investment in Gudo Sawaki or the so-called prophet Muhammed, but I can smell a hypocrite."
If nobody here has any investment in teh guy, why is it so hard for you all to admit that, I dunno, his actions were questionable to say the least?
What does a hypocrite smell like? I'd imagine it'd smell like someone who says reject authority but makes a messianic figure out of their zen teacher, says question everything but refuses to ask any tough questions about the men they basically worship, call religion the source of evil while claiming that their religion is not one and is thus exempt, and talk mad shit on others through public forums but run and yip like lapdogs when the favor is returned.
"I could say it is shameful for you to follow the religion of a mass murderer.. but I won't mock you."
Ahhh, I love the smell of passive-aggression in the morning....'Hey, I'm gonna mock you in a sentence that says I won't'. That would have been a clever rhetorical device were we in 8th grade. Anyway, call Muhammad (saws) names and slander him all you want, it's you who will eventually bare the burden for such slander. It's also not relevant to our conversation because, frankly, as I stated, it's not Islam vs. Buddhism or debating ancient history.
People, let me throw this your way; let us assume, for the sake of argument, that you CAN seperate a man's teachings from his actions. Kodo Sawaki's TEACHINGS were that nationalism, racialism, violence, and bloodshood WERE Buddhism, and he was hardly the only member of the zen establishment to say or think so. Am I saying this makes Zen evil? No. However, if you do not believe these things to be true, why would you hold this guy up as an example of enlightenment?
Honestly, it seems not only hypocritical, but cowardly, to dance around the issues like this.
"Why would you debate me about him then?"
Now I think you are being disingenuous. I am not debating you about Sawaki. I have made no statements regarding Sawaki or his character. You are the only one that has done so.
"Have you ever actually studied the Qu'ran, or are you just repeating something you heard somewhere?
I have not "studied" the book, but I have read it. I could easily cite examples to back up my point, but I think you already know what I am talking about.
"why would you hold this guy up as an example of enlightenment?
I haven't seen anyone on this blog claim Sawaki was enlightened.
My impression is that you are fishing for something to fight over.
Post a Comment
<< Home